Challange Ranking Ratio

From Gravopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 03:40, 20 April 2010 (edit)
Stratego (Talk | contribs)
(Rule for the Challange Ranking:)
← Previous diff
Current revision (15:11, 21 April 2010) (edit) (undo)
Stratego (Talk | contribs)
(Definitions)
 
(18 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Challenge Ranking Ratio == == Challenge Ranking Ratio ==
-* the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5+* the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)
-== Rule for the Challange Ranking: ==+== Rule for the Challenge Ranking: ==
-1. a player must play at least every n (n= 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.</br>+a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.
-2. all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio regardless what ranking a player has+ 
 +but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has.
 + 
 +(for the moment we choose 1:2 - every 3rd game)
== Definitions == == Definitions ==
Line 12: Line 15:
* 1st column: ranking number * 1st column: ranking number
* 2nd column: name of the player * 2nd column: name of the player
-* 3rd column: green = players with a positv ratio (>1) / red = players with a negativ ratio (<1)+* 3rd column: green = players with a ratio% >1 / red = players with a ratio% <1
* 4th column: total games * 4th column: total games
* 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio) * 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)
* 6th column: ratio- games (games which doesn`t count for the ratio) * 6th column: ratio- games (games which doesn`t count for the ratio)
-* 7th column: ratio% => the percentage by distribution between the ratio+ and ratio- no. of games+* 7th column: ratio% => percentage by distribution between ratio+ and ratio- games
* 8th - 13th column: no. of games * 8th - 13th column: no. of games
-** red => player has to play n ratio+ games to be in the ranking+** red => player missed the ratio with n games (to be in the ranking)
-** white => player can play n ratio- games before he miss the ratio+** white => player hit the ratio with n games
 + 
 +== How to read the table ==
 + 
 +the table is based at the total number of games. if we look at ace, we see, that he has played 247 games. 74 ratio+ games and 173 ratio- games.
 + 
 +his ratio% is 0,43. changing the ratio for the ranking to 1:1 he missed the ratio with 99 games (red = minus). if we change the ratio to 1:2 he
 + 
 +missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio)
 + 
 +ace would be good for a 1:2,5 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc
 + 
 +IMPORTANT:
 +the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total number of games
 + 
 +and then we have to calculate all parameters again. because we cannot play 0,4 or 0,7 games all results are rounded up.
 + 
 +in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.
 + 
 +all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. for sure its a challange for all, including the no.1
 + 
 +(taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%)
 + 
 + 
Line 377: Line 403:
| align="center" valign="bottom" | 1,00 | align="center" valign="bottom" | 1,00
|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 17 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 21 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 25 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 30 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 33 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|- |-
Line 391: Line 417:
|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 66 |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 66
| align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,52 | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,52
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -32 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 1 |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 1
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 5 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 9 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 14 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 17 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|- |-
Line 406: Line 432:
|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 71 |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 71
| align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,41 | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,41
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -42 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -4 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 4 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 9 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 12 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|- |-
Line 421: Line 447:
|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 75 |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 75
| align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,33 | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,33
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -50 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -8 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -4 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 5 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 8 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|- |-
Line 436: Line 462:
|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 80 |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 80
| align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,25 | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,25
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -60 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -13 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -9 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -5 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0
-| align="center" valign="bottom" | 3 +| align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|- |-
Line 451: Line 477:
|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 83 |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 83
| align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,20 | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,20
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -66 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -16 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -12 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -8 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
-|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -3 +|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | &nbsp;
|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0
|} |}

Current revision

Contents

[edit] Challenge Ranking Ratio

  • the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)

[edit] Rule for the Challenge Ranking:

a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.

but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has.

(for the moment we choose 1:2 - every 3rd game)

[edit] Definitions

  • 1st column: ranking number
  • 2nd column: name of the player
  • 3rd column: green = players with a ratio% >1 / red = players with a ratio% <1
  • 4th column: total games
  • 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)
  • 6th column: ratio- games (games which doesn`t count for the ratio)
  • 7th column: ratio% => percentage by distribution between ratio+ and ratio- games
  • 8th - 13th column: no. of games
    • red => player missed the ratio with n games (to be in the ranking)
    • white => player hit the ratio with n games

[edit] How to read the table

the table is based at the total number of games. if we look at ace, we see, that he has played 247 games. 74 ratio+ games and 173 ratio- games.

his ratio% is 0,43. changing the ratio for the ranking to 1:1 he missed the ratio with 99 games (red = minus). if we change the ratio to 1:2 he

missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio)

ace would be good for a 1:2,5 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc

IMPORTANT: the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total number of games

and then we have to calculate all parameters again. because we cannot play 0,4 or 0,7 games all results are rounded up.

in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.

all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. for sure its a challange for all, including the no.1

(taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%)



no. name   ges ratio + ratio - ratio % ratio 1:1 ratio 1:2 ratio 1:2,5 ratio 1:3 ratio 1:4 ratio 1:5
                         
1 AceRimmer   247 74 173 0,43 -99 -8 3 12 25 33
2 NoChance   72 37 35 1,06 2 13 16 19 23 25
3 gentleben   408 148 260 0,57 -112 12 31 46 66 80
4 Zach21   342 266 76 3,50 190 152 168 181 198 209
5 noes   294 110 184 0,60 -74 12 26 37 51 61
6 Blair   27 22 5 4,40 17 13 14 15 17 18
7 Rapunzel   540 258 282 0,91 -24 78 104 123 150 168
8 tomba   63 25 38 0,66 -13 4 7 9 12 15
9 GeenStijl   84 47 37 1,27 10 19 23 26 30 33
10 Fouche   266 156 110 1,42 46 67 80 90 103 112
11 gpet0   340 220 120 1,83 100 107 123 135 152 163
12 panther   59 30 29 1,03 1 10 13 15 18 20
13 AnDi   85 41 44 0,93 -3 13 17 20 24 27
14 Psychonaut   240 160 80 2,00 80 80 91 100 112 120
15 flieger   124 95 29 3,28 66 54 60 64 70 74
16 edbomb   224 163 61 2,67 102 88 99 107 118 126
17 Big_Rob   101 80 21 3,81 59 46 51 55 60 63
18 Iceman   47 33 14 2,36 19 17 20 21 24 25
19 PsychicWarrior   848 637 211 3,02 426 354 395 425 467 496
20 Samuel   93 42 51 0,82 -9 11 15 19 23 27
   
x TEST 1:1   100 50 50 1,00 0          
x TEST 1:2   100 34 66 0,52   1        
x TEST 1:2,5   100 29 71 0,41     0      
x TEST 1:3   100 25 75 0,33       0    
x TEST 1:4   100 20 80 0,25         0  
x TEST 1:5   100 17 83 0,20           0
Personal tools