Challange Ranking Ratio

From Gravopedia

Revision as of 13:35, 21 April 2010 (edit) Stratego (Talk | contribs) (→Rule for the Challange Ranking:) ← Previous diff		Current revision (15:11, 21 April 2010) (edit) (undo) Stratego (Talk | contribs) (→Definitions)
(One intermediate revision not shown.)
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)		* the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)
-	== Rule for the Challange Ranking: ==	+	== Rule for the Challenge Ranking: ==
	a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.		a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* 1st column: ranking number		* 1st column: ranking number
	* 2nd column: name of the player		* 2nd column: name of the player
-	* 3rd column: green = players with a positv ratio (>1) / red = players with a negativ ratio (<1)	+	* 3rd column: green = players with a ratio% >1 / red = players with a ratio% <1
	* 4th column: total games		* 4th column: total games
	* 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)		* 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)

---

Current revision

Contents 1 Challenge Ranking Ratio 2 Rule for the Challenge Ranking: 3 Definitions 4 How to read the table

[edit] Challenge Ranking Ratio

• the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)

[edit] Rule for the Challenge Ranking:

a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.

but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has.

(for the moment we choose 1:2 - every 3rd game)

[edit] Definitions

• 1st column: ranking number
• 2nd column: name of the player
• 3rd column: green = players with a ratio% >1 / red = players with a ratio% <1
• 4th column: total games
• 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)
• 6th column: ratio- games (games which doesn`t count for the ratio)
• 7th column: ratio% => percentage by distribution between ratio+ and ratio- games
• 8th - 13th column: no. of games
  • red => player missed the ratio with n games (to be in the ranking)
  • white => player hit the ratio with n games

[edit] How to read the table

the table is based at the total number of games. if we look at ace, we see, that he has played 247 games. 74 ratio+ games and 173 ratio- games.

his ratio% is 0,43. changing the ratio for the ranking to 1:1 he missed the ratio with 99 games (red = minus). if we change the ratio to 1:2 he

missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio)

ace would be good for a 1:2,5 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc

IMPORTANT: the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total number of games

and then we have to calculate all parameters again. because we cannot play 0,4 or 0,7 games all results are rounded up.

in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.

all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. for sure its a challange for all, including the no.1

(taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%)

no.	name		ges	ratio +	ratio -	ratio %	ratio 1:1	ratio 1:2	ratio 1:2,5	ratio 1:3	ratio 1:4	ratio 1:5
1	AceRimmer		247	74	173	0,43	-99	-8	3	12	25	33
2	NoChance		72	37	35	1,06	2	13	16	19	23	25
3	gentleben		408	148	260	0,57	-112	12	31	46	66	80
4	Zach21		342	266	76	3,50	190	152	168	181	198	209
5	noes		294	110	184	0,60	-74	12	26	37	51	61
6	Blair		27	22	5	4,40	17	13	14	15	17	18
7	Rapunzel		540	258	282	0,91	-24	78	104	123	150	168
8	tomba		63	25	38	0,66	-13	4	7	9	12	15
9	GeenStijl		84	47	37	1,27	10	19	23	26	30	33
10	Fouche		266	156	110	1,42	46	67	80	90	103	112
11	gpet0		340	220	120	1,83	100	107	123	135	152	163
12	panther		59	30	29	1,03	1	10	13	15	18	20
13	AnDi		85	41	44	0,93	-3	13	17	20	24	27
14	Psychonaut		240	160	80	2,00	80	80	91	100	112	120
15	flieger		124	95	29	3,28	66	54	60	64	70	74
16	edbomb		224	163	61	2,67	102	88	99	107	118	126
17	Big_Rob		101	80	21	3,81	59	46	51	55	60	63
18	Iceman		47	33	14	2,36	19	17	20	21	24	25
19	PsychicWarrior		848	637	211	3,02	426	354	395	425	467	496
20	Samuel		93	42	51	0,82	-9	11	15	19	23	27
x	TEST 1:1		100	50	50	1,00	0
x	TEST 1:2		100	34	66	0,52		1
x	TEST 1:2,5		100	29	71	0,41			0
x	TEST 1:3		100	25	75	0,33				0
x	TEST 1:4		100	20	80	0,25					0
x	TEST 1:5		100	17	83	0,20						0