Challange Ranking Ratio
From Gravopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 03:41, 20 April 2010 (edit) Stratego (Talk | contribs) (→Rule for the Challange Ranking:) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (15:11, 21 April 2010) (edit) (undo) Stratego (Talk | contribs) (→Definitions) |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Challenge Ranking Ratio == | == Challenge Ranking Ratio == | ||
| - | * the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 | + | * the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th) |
| - | == Rule for the Challange Ranking: == | + | == Rule for the Challenge Ranking: == |
| - | 1. a player must play at least every n (n= 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most. </br> | + | a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most. |
| - | 2. all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio regardless what ranking a player has | + | |
| + | but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (for the moment we choose 1:2 - every 3rd game) | ||
| == Definitions == | == Definitions == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 15: | ||
| * 1st column: ranking number | * 1st column: ranking number | ||
| * 2nd column: name of the player | * 2nd column: name of the player | ||
| - | * 3rd column: green = players with a positv ratio (>1) / red = players with a negativ ratio (<1) | + | * 3rd column: green = players with a ratio% >1 / red = players with a ratio% <1 |
| * 4th column: total games | * 4th column: total games | ||
| * 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio) | * 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio) | ||
| * 6th column: ratio- games (games which doesn`t count for the ratio) | * 6th column: ratio- games (games which doesn`t count for the ratio) | ||
| - | * 7th column: ratio% => the percentage by distribution between the ratio+ and ratio- no. of games | + | * 7th column: ratio% => percentage by distribution between ratio+ and ratio- games |
| * 8th - 13th column: no. of games | * 8th - 13th column: no. of games | ||
| - | ** red => player has to play n ratio+ games to be in the ranking | + | ** red => player missed the ratio with n games (to be in the ranking) |
| - | ** white => player can play n ratio- games before he miss the ratio | + | ** white => player hit the ratio with n games |
| + | |||
| + | == How to read the table == | ||
| + | |||
| + | the table is based at the total number of games. if we look at ace, we see, that he has played 247 games. 74 ratio+ games and 173 ratio- games. | ||
| + | |||
| + | his ratio% is 0,43. changing the ratio for the ranking to 1:1 he missed the ratio with 99 games (red = minus). if we change the ratio to 1:2 he | ||
| + | |||
| + | missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ace would be good for a 1:2,5 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc | ||
| + | |||
| + | IMPORTANT: | ||
| + | the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total number of games | ||
| + | |||
| + | and then we have to calculate all parameters again. because we cannot play 0,4 or 0,7 games all results are rounded up. | ||
| + | |||
| + | in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1. | ||
| + | |||
| + | all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. for sure its a challange for all, including the no.1 | ||
| + | |||
| + | (taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| Line 377: | Line 403: | ||
| | align="center" valign="bottom" | 1,00 | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 1,00 | ||
| |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | ||
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 17 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 21 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 25 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 30 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 33 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 391: | Line 417: | ||
| |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 66 | |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 66 | ||
| | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,52 | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,52 | ||
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -32 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 1 | |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 1 | ||
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 5 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 9 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 14 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 17 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 406: | Line 432: | ||
| |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 71 | |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 71 | ||
| | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,41 | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,41 | ||
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -42 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -4 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | ||
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 4 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 9 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 12 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 421: | Line 447: | ||
| |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 75 | |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 75 | ||
| | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,33 | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,33 | ||
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -50 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -8 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -4 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | ||
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 5 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 8 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 436: | Line 462: | ||
| |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 80 | |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 80 | ||
| | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,25 | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,25 | ||
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -60 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -13 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -9 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -5 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | ||
| - | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 3 | + | | align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 451: | Line 477: | ||
| |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 83 | |style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | 83 | ||
| | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,20 | | align="center" valign="bottom" | 0,20 | ||
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -66 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -16 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -12 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -8 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| - | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | -3 | + | |style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" | |
| |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | |style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" | 0 | ||
| |} | |} | ||
Current revision
Contents |
[edit] Challenge Ranking Ratio
- the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)
[edit] Rule for the Challenge Ranking:
a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.
but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has.
(for the moment we choose 1:2 - every 3rd game)
[edit] Definitions
- 1st column: ranking number
- 2nd column: name of the player
- 3rd column: green = players with a ratio% >1 / red = players with a ratio% <1
- 4th column: total games
- 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)
- 6th column: ratio- games (games which doesn`t count for the ratio)
- 7th column: ratio% => percentage by distribution between ratio+ and ratio- games
- 8th - 13th column: no. of games
- red => player missed the ratio with n games (to be in the ranking)
- white => player hit the ratio with n games
[edit] How to read the table
the table is based at the total number of games. if we look at ace, we see, that he has played 247 games. 74 ratio+ games and 173 ratio- games.
his ratio% is 0,43. changing the ratio for the ranking to 1:1 he missed the ratio with 99 games (red = minus). if we change the ratio to 1:2 he
missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio)
ace would be good for a 1:2,5 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc
IMPORTANT: the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total number of games
and then we have to calculate all parameters again. because we cannot play 0,4 or 0,7 games all results are rounded up.
in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.
all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. for sure its a challange for all, including the no.1
(taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%)
| no. | name | ges | ratio + | ratio - | ratio % | ratio 1:1 | ratio 1:2 | ratio 1:2,5 | ratio 1:3 | ratio 1:4 | ratio 1:5 | |
| 1 | AceRimmer | 247 | 74 | 173 | 0,43 | -99 | -8 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 33 | |
| 2 | NoChance | 72 | 37 | 35 | 1,06 | 2 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 23 | 25 | |
| 3 | gentleben | 408 | 148 | 260 | 0,57 | -112 | 12 | 31 | 46 | 66 | 80 | |
| 4 | Zach21 | 342 | 266 | 76 | 3,50 | 190 | 152 | 168 | 181 | 198 | 209 | |
| 5 | noes | 294 | 110 | 184 | 0,60 | -74 | 12 | 26 | 37 | 51 | 61 | |
| 6 | Blair | 27 | 22 | 5 | 4,40 | 17 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 18 | |
| 7 | Rapunzel | 540 | 258 | 282 | 0,91 | -24 | 78 | 104 | 123 | 150 | 168 | |
| 8 | tomba | 63 | 25 | 38 | 0,66 | -13 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
| 9 | GeenStijl | 84 | 47 | 37 | 1,27 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 26 | 30 | 33 | |
| 10 | Fouche | 266 | 156 | 110 | 1,42 | 46 | 67 | 80 | 90 | 103 | 112 | |
| 11 | gpet0 | 340 | 220 | 120 | 1,83 | 100 | 107 | 123 | 135 | 152 | 163 | |
| 12 | panther | 59 | 30 | 29 | 1,03 | 1 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 20 | |
| 13 | AnDi | 85 | 41 | 44 | 0,93 | -3 | 13 | 17 | 20 | 24 | 27 | |
| 14 | Psychonaut | 240 | 160 | 80 | 2,00 | 80 | 80 | 91 | 100 | 112 | 120 | |
| 15 | flieger | 124 | 95 | 29 | 3,28 | 66 | 54 | 60 | 64 | 70 | 74 | |
| 16 | edbomb | 224 | 163 | 61 | 2,67 | 102 | 88 | 99 | 107 | 118 | 126 | |
| 17 | Big_Rob | 101 | 80 | 21 | 3,81 | 59 | 46 | 51 | 55 | 60 | 63 | |
| 18 | Iceman | 47 | 33 | 14 | 2,36 | 19 | 17 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 25 | |
| 19 | PsychicWarrior | 848 | 637 | 211 | 3,02 | 426 | 354 | 395 | 425 | 467 | 496 | |
| 20 | Samuel | 93 | 42 | 51 | 0,82 | -9 | 11 | 15 | 19 | 23 | 27 | |
| x | TEST 1:1 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 1,00 | 0 | ||||||
| x | TEST 1:2 | 100 | 34 | 66 | 0,52 | 1 | ||||||
| x | TEST 1:2,5 | 100 | 29 | 71 | 0,41 | 0 | ||||||
| x | TEST 1:3 | 100 | 25 | 75 | 0,33 | 0 | ||||||
| x | TEST 1:4 | 100 | 20 | 80 | 0,25 | 0 | ||||||
| x | TEST 1:5 | 100 | 17 | 83 | 0,20 | 0 |
