Challange Ranking Ratio
From Gravopedia
| Revision as of 00:22, 21 April 2010 (edit) Stratego (Talk | contribs) (→Definitions) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 00:24, 21 April 2010 (edit) (undo) Stratego (Talk | contribs) (→How to read the table) Next diff → |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio) | missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio) | ||
| - | ace would be good for a 1:3 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc | + | ace would be good for a 1:2,5 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc |
| IMPORTANT: | IMPORTANT: | ||
| - | the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more change also the total numbers of games and then | + | the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total numbers of games and then |
| we have to calculate all parameters again. | we have to calculate all parameters again. | ||
| - | in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1 | + | in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1. |
| - | all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. forsure its a challange for all, including the no.1 | + | all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. for sure its a challange for all, including the no.1 |
| (taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%) | (taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%) | ||
Revision as of 00:24, 21 April 2010
Contents |
Challenge Ranking Ratio
- the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)
Rule for the Challange Ranking:
a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.
but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has
Definitions
- 1st column: ranking number
- 2nd column: name of the player
- 3rd column: green = players with a positv ratio (>1) / red = players with a negativ ratio (<1)
- 4th column: total games
- 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)
- 6th column: ratio- games (games which doesn`t count for the ratio)
- 7th column: ratio% => percentage by distribution between ratio+ and ratio- games
- 8th - 13th column: no. of games
- red => player has to play n ratio+ games to be in the ranking
- white => player can play n ratio- games before he miss the ratio
How to read the table
the table is based at the total number of games. if we look at ace, we see, that he has played 247 games. 74 ratio+ games and 173 ratio- games.
his ratio% is 0,43. changing the ratio for the ranking to 1:1 he missed the ratio with 99 games (red = minus). if we change the ratio to 1:2 he
missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio)
ace would be good for a 1:2,5 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc
IMPORTANT: the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total numbers of games and then
we have to calculate all parameters again.
in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.
all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. for sure its a challange for all, including the no.1
(taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%)
| no. | name | ges | ratio + | ratio - | ratio % | ratio 1:1 | ratio 1:2 | ratio 1:2,5 | ratio 1:3 | ratio 1:4 | ratio 1:5 | |
| 1 | AceRimmer | 247 | 74 | 173 | 0,43 | -99 | -8 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 33 | |
| 2 | NoChance | 72 | 37 | 35 | 1,06 | 2 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 23 | 25 | |
| 3 | gentleben | 408 | 148 | 260 | 0,57 | -112 | 12 | 31 | 46 | 66 | 80 | |
| 4 | Zach21 | 342 | 266 | 76 | 3,50 | 190 | 152 | 168 | 181 | 198 | 209 | |
| 5 | noes | 294 | 110 | 184 | 0,60 | -74 | 12 | 26 | 37 | 51 | 61 | |
| 6 | Blair | 27 | 22 | 5 | 4,40 | 17 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 18 | |
| 7 | Rapunzel | 540 | 258 | 282 | 0,91 | -24 | 78 | 104 | 123 | 150 | 168 | |
| 8 | tomba | 63 | 25 | 38 | 0,66 | -13 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
| 9 | GeenStijl | 84 | 47 | 37 | 1,27 | 10 | 19 | 23 | 26 | 30 | 33 | |
| 10 | Fouche | 266 | 156 | 110 | 1,42 | 46 | 67 | 80 | 90 | 103 | 112 | |
| 11 | gpet0 | 340 | 220 | 120 | 1,83 | 100 | 107 | 123 | 135 | 152 | 163 | |
| 12 | panther | 59 | 30 | 29 | 1,03 | 1 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 20 | |
| 13 | AnDi | 85 | 41 | 44 | 0,93 | -3 | 13 | 17 | 20 | 24 | 27 | |
| 14 | Psychonaut | 240 | 160 | 80 | 2,00 | 80 | 80 | 91 | 100 | 112 | 120 | |
| 15 | flieger | 124 | 95 | 29 | 3,28 | 66 | 54 | 60 | 64 | 70 | 74 | |
| 16 | edbomb | 224 | 163 | 61 | 2,67 | 102 | 88 | 99 | 107 | 118 | 126 | |
| 17 | Big_Rob | 101 | 80 | 21 | 3,81 | 59 | 46 | 51 | 55 | 60 | 63 | |
| 18 | Iceman | 47 | 33 | 14 | 2,36 | 19 | 17 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 25 | |
| 19 | PsychicWarrior | 848 | 637 | 211 | 3,02 | 426 | 354 | 395 | 425 | 467 | 496 | |
| 20 | Samuel | 93 | 42 | 51 | 0,82 | -9 | 11 | 15 | 19 | 23 | 27 | |
| x | TEST 1:1 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 1,00 | 0 | 17 | 21 | 25 | 30 | 33 | |
| x | TEST 1:2 | 100 | 34 | 66 | 0,52 | -32 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 17 | |
| x | TEST 1:2,5 | 100 | 29 | 71 | 0,41 | -42 | -4 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 12 | |
| x | TEST 1:3 | 100 | 25 | 75 | 0,33 | -50 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 5 | 8 | |
| x | TEST 1:4 | 100 | 20 | 80 | 0,25 | -60 | -13 | -9 | -5 | 0 | 3 | |
| x | TEST 1:5 | 100 | 17 | 83 | 0,20 | -66 | -16 | -12 | -8 | -3 | 0 |
