Challange Ranking Ratio - Revision history

Stratego: /* Definitions */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:11:19 GMT

Definitions

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 21 April 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* 1st column: ranking number		* 1st column: ranking number
	* 2nd column: name of the player		* 2nd column: name of the player
-	* 3rd column: green = players with a positv ratio (>1) / red = players with a negativ ratio (<1)	+	* 3rd column: green = players with a ratio% >1 / red = players with a ratio% <1
	* 4th column: total games		* 4th column: total games
	* 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)		* 5th column: ratio+ games (games which count for the ratio)

Stratego: /* Rule for the Challange Ranking: */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:00:04 GMT

Rule for the Challange Ranking:

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 21 April 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)		* the table below shows the top 20 player within their ratio games and 6 test-players with a ratio between 1:1 and 1:5 (as at april 19th)

-	== Rule for the Challange Ranking: ==	+	== Rule for the Challenge Ranking: ==

	a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.		a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.

Stratego: /* Rule for the Challange Ranking: */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:35:20 GMT

Rule for the Challange Ranking:

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 21 April 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.		a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.

-	but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has	+	but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has.
		+
		+	(for the moment we choose 1:2 - every 3rd game)

	== Definitions ==		== Definitions ==

Stratego: /* How to read the table */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:30:14 GMT

How to read the table

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 21 April 2010
Line 33:		Line 33:

	IMPORTANT:		IMPORTANT:
-	the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total numbers of games and then	+	the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total number of games

-	we have to calculate all parameters again. because we cannot play 0,4 or 0,7 games all results are rounded up.	+	and then we have to calculate all parameters again. because we cannot play 0,4 or 0,7 games all results are rounded up.

	in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.		in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.

Stratego: /* How to read the table */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:24:46 GMT

How to read the table

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:24, 21 April 2010
Line 35:		Line 35:
	the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total numbers of games and then		the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total numbers of games and then

-	we have to calculate all parameters again.	+	we have to calculate all parameters again. because we cannot play 0,4 or 0,7 games all results are rounded up.

	in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.		in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.

Stratego: /* How to read the table */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:22:47 GMT

How to read the table

Stratego: /* Definitions */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:16:17 GMT

Definitions

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 21 April 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* 7th column: ratio% => percentage by distribution between ratio+ and ratio- games		* 7th column: ratio% => percentage by distribution between ratio+ and ratio- games
	* 8th - 13th column: no. of games		* 8th - 13th column: no. of games
-	** red => player has to play n ratio+ games to be in the ranking	+	** red => player missed the ratio with n games (to be in the ranking)
-	** white => player can play n ratio- games before he miss the ratio	+	** white => player hit the ratio with n games

	== How to read the table ==		== How to read the table ==

Stratego: /* How to read the table */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:24:51 GMT

How to read the table

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 21 April 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:
	missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio)		missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio)

-	ace would be good for a 1:3 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc	+	ace would be good for a 1:2,5 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc

	IMPORTANT:		IMPORTANT:
-	the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more change also the total numbers of games and then	+	the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more would change the total numbers of games and then

	we have to calculate all parameters again.		we have to calculate all parameters again.

-	in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1	+	in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1.

-	all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. forsure its a challange for all, including the no.1	+	all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. for sure its a challange for all, including the no.1

	(taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%)		(taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%)

Stratego: /* Definitions */

Stratego — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:22:25 GMT

Definitions

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 21 April 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	** red => player has to play n ratio+ games to be in the ranking		** red => player has to play n ratio+ games to be in the ranking
	** white => player can play n ratio- games before he miss the ratio		** white => player can play n ratio- games before he miss the ratio
		+
		+	== How to read the table ==
		+
		+	the table is based at the total number of games. if we look at ace, we see, that he has played 247 games. 74 ratio+ games and 173 ratio- games.
		+
		+	his ratio% is 0,43. changing the ratio for the ranking to 1:1 he missed the ratio with 99 games (red = minus). if we change the ratio to 1:2 he
		+
		+	missed the ratio with 8 games (247 total - with 82 instead of 74 ratio+ games and then 165 ratio- games he had hit the ratio)
		+
		+	ace would be good for a 1:3 ratio with a plus of 3 games. etc etc
		+
		+	IMPORTANT:
		+	the table and numbers do not say, that ace must play 8 games now to hit the ratio. 8 games more change also the total numbers of games and then
		+
		+	we have to calculate all parameters again.
		+
		+	in the end we force the players to a ratio% of 0.5 - i think this is a must for a player who wants to be ranked at 1
		+
		+	all other players fit with the 1:2 ratio. lets see if 1:2 is the best solution. forsure its a challange for all, including the no.1
		+
		+	(taking ace as an example does not mean, that he is a cherry picker like dozer and i am sure that ace himself wasn`t happy with his ratio%)
		+
		+

Stratego: /* Rule for the Challange Ranking: */

Stratego — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:54:57 GMT

Rule for the Challange Ranking:

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:54, 20 April 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Rule for the Challange Ranking: ==		== Rule for the Challange Ranking: ==

-	1. a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.	+	a player must play at least every n (n= 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...) game against a player who is ranked two hundred points lower at most.

-	2. all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has	+	but all games against players with an at least 1500 rating count for the ratio, regardless what rating a player has

	== Definitions ==		== Definitions ==

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 21 April 2010
Line 401:		Line 401:
	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 1,00		\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 1,00
	\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0		\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 17	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 21	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 25	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 30	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 33	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|

	\|-		\|-
Line 415:		Line 415:
	\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 66		\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 66
	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,52		\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,52
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -32	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
	\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 1		\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 1
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 5	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 9	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 14	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 17	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|

	\|-		\|-
Line 430:		Line 430:
	\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 71		\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 71
	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,41		\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,41
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -42	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -4	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
	\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0		\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 4	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 9	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 12	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|

	\|-		\|-
Line 445:		Line 445:
	\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 75		\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 75
	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,33		\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,33
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -50	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -8	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -4	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
	\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0		\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 5	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 8	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|

	\|-		\|-
Line 460:		Line 460:
	\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 80		\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 80
	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,25		\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,25
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -60	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -13	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -9	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -5	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
	\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0		\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0
-	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 3	+	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \|

	\|-		\|-
Line 475:		Line 475:
	\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 83		\|style="background-color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 83
	\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,20		\| align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0,20
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -66	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -16	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -12	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -8	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
-	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \| -3	+	\|style="color:#FF0000" align="center" valign="bottom" \|
	\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0		\|style="background-color:#FF6600" align="center" valign="bottom" \| 0

	\|}		\|}